🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the announcement of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Negotiation and Warfare

The succession of opposing developments captured the bleak nature of the recent timeframe. By day, diplomatic battles are fought: hopeful statements are issued from different nations. Considerable effort is allocated on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "settlement".

After-Dark Attacks

As the offensive developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is able to track missile launches from enemy soil, a ability afforded by up-to-date information. From observation points, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been scrambled to intercept incoming guided weapons roared overhead – sophisticated military planes provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: multiple launches deployed against a incoming threat. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, probably supplied through partner states. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: maybe the approaching threat won't hit its mark this time, sparing the city from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Not long after, a automatic firearm fired at a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – almost certainly allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its objective.

Periodically, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: multiple fatalities, devastation and utility failures in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As customarily, everyone still went about their day – experiencing conflict. But those 24 hours illustrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a reliance that regional partners are demonstrably unable to substitute in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from US administration provoked deep reactions, debate and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new initiative from American administration follows the same pattern: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually win the battle. This cycle will, undoubtedly, endure.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington works based on a premise familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have lost on the battlefield. The US administration believes that it is unrealistic to force Russia to surrender the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from assuming that the situation will not change more in its advantage in the near future.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their incentive to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is almost completely absent. There may be many attempts to stop fighting, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, progressively conceding people and territory but avoiding a complete military breakdown until situations evolve in its advantage.

Present Conditions

Objectively, there are no actual prerequisites for a ceasefire. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: leadership ambitions to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their attention does not move to homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Assessment and Future

It took a mere seven days to terminate the proposed articles of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are imminent, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are based on Russian demands and show certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they maintain solidarity and enhance their military capacity at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to defend against evening bombardments will, for the predictable period, mainly require ongoing international assistance.